Goldstein’s book is baffling to me.
Its symbolic purpose is rebellion yet I see little purpose in its physical
cause, especially in Winston’s case. It basically goes over the party’s history
and reasons for its actions which Winston already knows. Its long descriptions merely
confirm what Winston already suspects. For this very reason, I am suspicious
about the book and O’Brien. The book seems to fit Winston almost too perfectly.
What are the odds that it confirms every one of Winston’s beliefs, no more and
no less? Why is it that the book offers neither real conclusions nor
instructions? It sounds more like a history text book rather than a high-crime
offence. This may just be the reason why it is so detrimental to the party; it
is comprised of pure, unchanging and unaltered facts. However, after reading
it, what is a rebeller supposed to take away from it? If he or she had made it
this far into the brotherhood, they would already have these thoughts. This brings
me to my next point; does the brotherhood actually exist?
If the
brotherhood were to exist, wouldn’t it achieve some sort of goal rather than
remain secretive? To be victorious, there needs to be a winner and a loser but
who’s to know whether the brotherhood is victorious or not if they are so
secret about their doings? In other words, someone outside the brotherhood, has
to be aware of a victory for it to count as so. Otherwise, it does not matter whether
they make advances or not because there is no effect. I am suspicious that they
even exist and I believe that O’Brien may have set up the whole hoax to catch
Winston and Julia. On the other hand, there really could be a brotherhood but
it obviously isn’t doing too well for they haven’t made any advances and even
if they had, they are unknown of and therefore nonexistent.
No comments:
Post a Comment